SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 2
SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 2
| Date of judgment | 10th April 2020 |
|---|---|
| Judge | Judge CreatingKing |
| Charges | 1 charge of Indecent Exposure (Article 44 of the Criminal Code) |
| Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Indecent Exposure |
| Sentence | 2 weeks mute[1] Parole rescinded |
| Applicable persuasive precedent | Any posts which may lead to people being uncomfortable or get in trouble irl due to sexual contact are NSFW 1 |
| Appeal | Case partially affirmed by the Supreme Court[2] Ivy Cactus, ex parte Dickhead68 (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 9 |
JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing[3]
[1]. My verdict has been reached. First and foremost. I ask those in power to create a more stringent set of guidelines for NSFW content. With that said, I am taking this opportunity to set a standard for NSFW content. It is quite clear that the "borderline NSFW" content has caused some concern for many people on this server. I am of the opinion that if you are posing NSFW content, even if it is for a meme, it should be relegated to be either tagged and censored or relegated to an NSFW channel. As even as a joke, the type of NSFW content posted can lead to and has led to people in general feeling uncomfortable or potentially running into issues IRL. With all this in mind, I find the defendant guilty and rescind his parole. He will serve out the rest of his previous sentence.
[2]. Regarding the argument that no one has been previously imprisoned for posting such content, we have to set the bar somewhere, and I am setting it now.
