View source for In re 138th Senate Election 2025 SDSC 4

[[Category: Case Law|2025-03-31]] [[Category:Supreme Court Cases|2025-03-31]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2025|2025-03-31]]
= In re 138th Senate Election 2025 SDSC 4 =

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left;"
|-
! Alternate citation
! Emergency Verdict In re The 138th Senate Election<br>
''In re 138th Senate Election'' [2025] SDSC 4
|-
| Date of judgment
| 31st March 2025
|-
| Justices
| Chief Justice TheLittleSparty<br> Justice Ivy Cactus
|-
| Held
| 
* The 138th Election was held unlawfully and must be redone.
* The Senate would be allowed to operate as is in the interim.
|-
| Ruling
| N/A
|-
| Applicable precedent
| 
|}

== MAJORITY OPINION by Justice Ivy Cactus==
''(with Chief Justice TheLittleSparty agreeing)''

=== Introduction ===
[1] The 138th Senate election was run without candidate Sesruinen after Election Supervisor Syndicality failed to include them on the ballot despite a valid CFC.

[2] [[In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections 2020 SDSC 10|In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections [2020] SDSC 10]] establishes a two part test for determining remedy, one that asks how grave the action was and another asking how proportionate the remedy is.

[3] In this case, given the unconstitutional nature of the action and the possible repercussions of a missing candidate on the entirety of the election, the graveness of the infringement is great.

[4] Given such the only proportionate remedy is to redo the election in its entirety with the missing candidate included.

[5] The question, then, becomes if the current version of the Senate should be allowed to continue operating in the period between it's election and the election of the correct Senate with the missing candidate included.

[6] The court believes stopping multiple days of Senate work to be an extreme response, needing massive justification, given that it deprives the voters of SimDemocracy legislative representation. Pursuant to the test established above and [[In re 39th Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 11|In re 39th Presidential Election [2020] SDSC 11]], and given the accidental nature of the actions as well as the unlikeliness for the Senate's composition to dramatically alter, forbidding the current Senate from doing work in the interim is unduly costly. 

[7] Given this, the current Senate is to be allowed to take it's seat and operate normally until the conclusion of the new election.

===Verdict===
[8] The election is to be reheld immediately with the missing candidate included.

[9] The Senate, as currently elected, is to be allowed to operate normally in the interim.

===Post Script===
[10] This verdict was written in great haste and under non-ideal conditions due to the urgency and time sensitive nature of the issue, the court apologizes for any typographical or grammatical errors throughout the verdict.