View source for SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 2

[[Category:Case Law|2020-04-10]] [[Category:Criminal Cases|2020-04-10]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2020|2020-04-10]]
= SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 2=

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
|-
! Date of judgment
! 10th April 2020
|-
| Judge
| Judge CreatingKing
|-
| Charges
| 1 charge of Indecent Exposure (Article 44 of the Criminal Code)
|-
| Verdict
| Guilty of 1 charge of Indecent Exposure
|-
| Sentence
| 2 weeks mute<ref>Originally no sentence was given.</ref> Parole rescinded
|-
| Applicable persuasive precedent
| Any posts which may lead to people being uncomfortable or get in trouble irl due to sexual contact are NSFW 1
|-
| Appeal
| Case partially affirmed by the Supreme Court<ref>The judge was ordered by the Supreme Court to give a sentence for the crime.</ref> ''Ivy Cactus, ex parte Dickhead68'' (Appellant) v ''State of SimDemocracy'' (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 9
|}
== JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing<ref>Paragraph numbering retrospectively added.</ref>==

'''[1].''' My verdict has been reached. First and foremost. I ask those in power to create a more stringent set of guidelines for NSFW content. With that said, I am taking this opportunity to set a standard for NSFW content.  It is quite clear that the "borderline NSFW" content has caused some concern for many people on this server. I am of the opinion that if you are posing NSFW content, even if it is for a meme, it should be relegated to be either tagged and censored or relegated to an NSFW channel. As even as a joke, the type of NSFW content posted can lead to and has led to people in general feeling uncomfortable or potentially running into issues IRL. With all this in mind, I find the defendant guilty and rescind his parole. He will serve out the rest of his previous sentence.

'''[2].''' Regarding the argument that no one has been previously imprisoned for posting such content, we have to set the bar somewhere, and I am setting it now.


==Citations==
<references />