In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6: Revision history

From SimDemocracy Archives

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 March 2025

20 March 2025

9 March 2025

  • curprev 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Chief Archivist Ferris talk contribs 3,794 bytes +3,794 Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 3rd February 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy Justice Danyo |- | Held | The Contract Act is constitutional and consistent with the right to privacy and the right to liberty and security of the person |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy== ''(with Justice Da..."