In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1: Revision history

From SimDemocracy Archives

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 March 2025

20 March 2025

9 March 2025

  • curprev 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Chief Archivist Ferris talk contribs 1,753 bytes +1,753 Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Match Stix Justice Danyo Justice Euphyrric |- | Held | Ticket Act was unconstitutional because it deprived the right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Justice Danyo== ''(with Justices Match Stix and Euphyrric agreeing)'' '''[1].''' Article 22 (..."