In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3: Revision history

31 March 2025

• curprev 18:2118:21, 31 March 2025 Benbookworm97 talk contribs 17,157 bytes +10,798 Ferris didn't sanitize his inputs. An ampersand cut everything off

26 March 2025

• curprev 17:1817:18, 26 March 2025 Benbookworm97 talk contribs 6,359 bytes +33 Categorized

20 March 2025

• curprev 19:0419:04, 20 March 2025 Benbookworm97 talk contribs 6,326 bytes +68 Categorized

9 March 2025

• curprev 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Chief Archivist Ferris talk contribs 6,258 bytes +6,258 Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th March 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | The state did not meet the Clear and Convincing standard, and the votes were not fraudulent. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The respondent is allowed to agree with the petitioner, 7 Votes must be removed usin..."