In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1: Revision history

From SimDemocracy Archives

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

26 March 2025

20 March 2025

9 March 2025

  • curprev 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Chief Archivist Ferris talk contribs 9,626 bytes +9,626 Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 23rd December 2019 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Euphyrric Justice Danyo Justice Match Stix |- | Held | Restraining Order Act was unconstitutional because it deprived right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Freedom of expression protects “a citizen’s rights to freely express their political and religious..."