SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3: Difference between revisions
From SimDemocracy Archives
Categorized |
Categorized |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Case Law]] [[Category:Criminal Cases]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2020]] | [[Category:Case Law|2020-06-26]] [[Category:Criminal Cases|2020-06-26]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2020|2020-06-26]] | ||
= SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3= | = SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3= | ||
Latest revision as of 20:59, 25 March 2025
SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3
| Date of judgment | 26th June 2020 |
|---|---|
| Judge | Judge CreatingKing |
| Charges | 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts (Article 19 of the Criminal Code) |
| Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts |
| Sentence | 7 month ban |
| Applicable persuasive precedent |
JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing[1]
[1]. I have reached my verdict. The defendant is found guilty and is to be banned for seven months for use of alternate accounts.
[2]. After reviewing the evidence, I found that, without a reasonable doubt, the defendant had used alternate accounts to circumvent his ban.
[3]. Thus the defendant has been found guilty of all charges and has been sentenced to the punishment recommended by the prosecution.
Citations
- ↑ Paragraph numbering retrospectively added
