SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3: Difference between revisions
From SimDemocracy Archives
Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 7th August 2019 |- | Judge | Judge lolcheapboosts |- | Charges | 1 charge of Spam (Article I.B.8 of the Community Standards Amendment) |- | Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Spam |- | Sentence | 12 hours of isolation |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | It does not matter whether D commits a crime in jest or not, 3 Partially overturned by ''SD v MrCyn..." |
Categorized |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Case Law]] | [[Category:Case Law|2019-08-07]] [[Category:Criminal Cases|2019-08-07]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2019|2019-08-07]] | ||
= SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3= | = SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3= | ||
Latest revision as of 03:09, 26 March 2025
SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3
| Date of judgment | 7th August 2019 |
|---|---|
| Judge | Judge lolcheapboosts |
| Charges | 1 charge of Spam (Article I.B.8 of the Community Standards Amendment) |
| Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Spam |
| Sentence | 12 hours of isolation |
| Applicable persuasive precedent | It does not matter whether D commits a crime in jest or not, 3 Partially overturned by SD v MrCynical 2019 Crim 6 |
JUDGMENT by Judge lolcheapboosts[1]
[1]. On one count of spam, the defendant is found guilty and is to be sentenced to 12hr isolation
[2]. Although the defendant had stopped after being asked, the initial spam had a negative effect on the community and on the community members
[3]. Breaking the law as a joke is still breaking the law
Citations
- ↑ Paragraph numbering added retrospectively
