SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3

SD v NovaSM 2019 Crim 3

Date of judgment	7th August 2019
Judge	Judge lolcheapboosts
Charges	1 charge of Spam (Article I.B.8 of the Community Standards Amendment)
Verdict	Guilty of 1 charge of Spam
Sentence	12 hours of isolation
Applicable persuasive precedent	It does not matter whether D commits a crime in jest or not, 3 Partially overturned by SD v MrCynical 2019 Crim 6

JUDGMENT by Judge lolcheapboosts

[1]. On one count of spam, the defendant is found guilty and is to be sentenced to 12hr isolation

[2]. Although the defendant had stopped after being asked, the initial spam had a negative effect on the community and on the community members

[3]. Breaking the law as a joke is still breaking the law