SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3: Difference between revisions
From SimDemocracy Archives
Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 26th June 2020 |- | Judge | Judge CreatingKing |- | Charges | 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts (Article 19 of the Criminal Code) |- | Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts |- | Sentence | 7 month ban |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | |} == JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing<ref>Paragraph numbering retrospectively..." |
Categorized |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Case Law]] | [[Category:Case Law]] [[Category:Criminal Cases]] [[Category:Court Cases from 2020]] | ||
= SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3= | = SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3= | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 20 March 2025
SD v Dickhead68 2020 Crim 3
Date of judgment | 26th June 2020 |
---|---|
Judge | Judge CreatingKing |
Charges | 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts (Article 19 of the Criminal Code) |
Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Abuse of Alternative Accounts |
Sentence | 7 month ban |
Applicable persuasive precedent |
JUDGMENT by Judge CreatingKing[1]
[1]. I have reached my verdict. The defendant is found guilty and is to be banned for seven months for use of alternate accounts.
[2]. After reviewing the evidence, I found that, without a reasonable doubt, the defendant had used alternate accounts to circumvent his ban.
[3]. Thus the defendant has been found guilty of all charges and has been sentenced to the punishment recommended by the prosecution.
Citations
- ↑ Paragraph numbering retrospectively added