SD v adeacentpear 2025 Crim 14

From SimDemocracy Archives
Revision as of 18:08, 28 February 2025 by Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law {| class="wikitable" |- ! Prosecutor ! State of SimDemocracy |- | Prosecuting Attorney | Confused Bartender (mrgamerboy) |- | Defendant | Niko Belic (adeacentpear) |- | Defendant's attorney | Aerospace Enjoyer (busiedcomb) |- | Judge | Average787enjoyer (intelligentdonut) |- | Courtroom | [https://discord.com/channels/554769523635650580/1112746860906545172/1341172025477169192 #public-court-5] |- | Criminal Complaint | [https://docs.google.com/docum...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Prosecutor State of SimDemocracy
Prosecuting Attorney Confused Bartender (mrgamerboy)
Defendant Niko Belic (adeacentpear)
Defendant's attorney Aerospace Enjoyer (busiedcomb)
Judge Average787enjoyer (intelligentdonut)
Courtroom #public-court-5
Criminal Complaint CC
Evidence Evidence

Verdict

[1] The Prosecution provided evidence of multiple everyone pings by the Defendant which were independently verified, happening one right after the other
[2] The Defense argued that the defendant did not have Everyone permissions and that the actions in question were done in jest
[3] The court notes that according to SD v Mooklyn [2021] Crim 4, jest is not a defense
[4] The court rejects the defense's argument that the Defendant had no knowledge of the everyone ping ability, as a reasonable person would have checked the easily accessible permissions in the server settings before performing such a risky act
[5] The court finds the Defendant guilty on all counts and sentences them to a 3 week mute