SD v adeacentpear 2025 Crim 14

From SimDemocracy Archives
Revision as of 20:38, 25 March 2025 by Benbookworm97 (talk | contribs) (Benbookworm97 moved page SD v adacentpear 2025 Crim 14 to SD v adeacentpear 2025 Crim 14 without leaving a redirect: Misspelled title)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Prosecutor State of SimDemocracy
Prosecuting Attorney Confused Bartender (mrgamerboy)
Defendant Niko Belic (adeacentpear)
Defendant's attorney Aerospace Enjoyer (busiedcomb)
Judge Average787enjoyer (intelligentdonut)
Courtroom #public-court-5
Criminal Complaint CC
Evidence Evidence

Verdict

[1] The Prosecution provided evidence of multiple everyone pings by the Defendant which were independently verified, happening one right after the other
[2] The Defense argued that the defendant did not have Everyone permissions and that the actions in question were done in jest
[3] The court notes that according to SD v Mooklyn [2021] Crim 4, jest is not a defense
[4] The court rejects the defense's argument that the Defendant had no knowledge of the everyone ping ability, as a reasonable person would have checked the easily accessible permissions in the server settings before performing such a risky act
[5] The court finds the Defendant guilty on all counts and sentences them to a 3 week mute