New pages

9 March 2025

• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 SD v Dickhead68 2019 Crim 1 (hist | edit) [1,541 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v Dickhead68 2019 Crim 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 30th June 2019 |- | Judge | Judge lolcheapboosts |- | Charges | 1 charge of Impersonation (Article I.B.7 of the Community Standards Amendment) 1 charge of Attempted Bribery (common law) |- | Verdict | Not guilty of 1 charge of Impersonation Not guilty of 1 charge of Attempted Bribery |- | Sentence | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | A person...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 SD v Catchers 2020 Crim 8 (hist | edit) [8,067 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v Catchers 2020 Crim 8= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 9th September 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Ivy Cactus |- | Charges | 1 charge of Treason (Article 55 of the Criminal Code) |- | Verdict | Guilty of 1 charge of Treason |- | Sentence | 4 month ban, 3 month forbiddance from the DLE |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | If counts of a crime are not specifically defined in the Criminal Code, a count is assu...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 SD v BTernaryTau 2020 Crim 11 (hist | edit) [1,853 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v BTernaryTau 2020 Crim 11= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th October 2020 |- | Judge | Judge TheMainCharacter |- | Charges | 1 charge of Misuse of Permissions (Article 34 of the Criminal Code) |- | Verdict | Guilty |- | Sentence | τ500 fine |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | |} == JUDGMENT by Judge TheMainCharacter== '''[1].''' The court established that the defendant reminded people to wish N...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 SD v BelugaWhaleMan 2021 Crim 5 (hist | edit) [6,316 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = SD v BelugaWhaleMan 2021 Crim 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th February 2021 |- | Judge | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus |- | Charges | 1 charge of Smut (Article 44b of the Criminal Code) |- | Verdict | Defendant found Not Guilty for the crime of Smut |- | Sentence | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | A person may not be unbanned to act as a witness, 3 Presenting evidence without any proof is invalid,...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 SammySnail v NovaSM 2019 Civ 2 (hist | edit) [1,496 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = SammySnail v NovaSM 2019 Civ 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 15th July 2019 |- | Judge | Judge Euphyrric |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held liable for civil harassment |- | Result | D was detained in the “naughty corner” for one (1) hour<ref>Detention and giving punishment roles are now no longer permitted in civil cases. This case was done at a time when there was no...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Reference re Treaties 2021 SDSC 4 (hist | edit) [8,962 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Reference re Treaties 2021 SDSC 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 29th March 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | Treaties only have the power to dictate the government in relation to Foreign Affairs, but may be ratified as legislation or a Constitutional Amendment to expand its power. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Treaties passed...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Reference re Length of Summary Bans 2020 SDSC 22 (hist | edit) [25,851 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Reference re Length of Summary Bans 2020 SDSC 22= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 2nd December 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Acting Justice Kangawolf |- | Held | Summary bans are permanent in egregious cases, but are appealable via judicial review. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Persons summary banned must be informed of their right to judicial review, 3...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 RandomPearson v DepressedBisexual 2021 Civ 1 (hist | edit) [8,087 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = RandomPearson v DepressedBisexual 2021 Civ 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 10th February 2021 |- | Judge | Justice TheLittleSparty |- | Grounds | Tort of Defamation (Article 16\) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for Defamation |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Personal insults do not constitute Defamation, 10 The court may make nonbinding requests for remedy, even if the defendant is...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 NovaSM v Dickhead68 2019 Civ 1 (hist | edit) [1,808 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = NovaSM v Dickhead68 2019 Civ 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 12th July 2019 |- | Judge | Judge lolcheapboosts |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law), Bail violation (common law)<ref>This case was done at a time when there was no separation of civil and criminal law. Bail violation would not be considered a tort (civil wrong) nowadays, it would be a crime.</ref> |- | Verdict | D held liable for civi...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Nighteye (Appellant) v LordDeadlyOwl (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 5 (hist | edit) [7,855 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Nighteye (Appellant) v LordDeadlyOwl (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th January 2020 |- | Justices | Justice Danyo Judge halfcat |- | Held | Automatically handing a civil case in favour of the plaintiff when the defendant is absent (and when D has not acted maliciously or in contempt) unconstitutionally violates the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable preced...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Mobilfan v Dickhead68 2020 Civ 3 (hist | edit) [11,327 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Mobilfan v Dickhead68 2020 Civ 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 3rd June 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Ivy Cactus |- | Grounds | Defamation (Defamation Act) Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for defamation D held not liable for civil harassment |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Implicit requests to cease harassment are just as legally valid as explicit requests,...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 Ivy Cactus, ex parte Dickhead68 (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 9 (hist | edit) [3,607 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Ivy Cactus, ex parte Dickhead68 (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 9= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 25th May 2020 |- | Justices | Acting Chief Justice Wolf Acting Justice Mobilfan Acting Justice Comstock |- | Held | The omission of a sentence in a judge’s verdict is unlawful |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Procedural errors which do not affect the finding of guilt d...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re War and Peace Act 2024 2024 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [26,373 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re War and Peace Act 2024 2024 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 3rd December 2024 |- | Justices | Chief Justice halfcat Justice Alexa |- | Held | Article 1 §1 of the War and Peace Act 2024 is unconstitutional and is to be rendered null and void |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Foreign affairs is all interactions between SimDemocracy and an outside entity, 19 Treaties signed by the pr...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 SDSC 4 (hist | edit) [4,185 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 SDSC 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 27th January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy Justice Danyo |- | Held | The Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act was unconstitutional because the procedure it created caused an infinite loop, unconstitutionally depriving the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The Supreme...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Toastdick Emoji 2020 SDSC 17 (hist | edit) [6,371 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Toastdick Emoji 2020 SDSC 17= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 13th October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice SeaOtter |- | Held | The Toastdick emoji violates the Discord Terms of Service |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Mild NSFW content comprises of content which makes people feel uncomfortable or which would present issues for them in real life, 11 NSF...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [1,854 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Match Stix Justice Danyo Justice Euphyrric |- | Held | Ticket Act was unconstitutional because it deprived the right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Justice Danyo== ''(with Justices Match Stix and Euphyrric agreeing)'' '''[1].''' Article 22 (...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re TheReak Contempt of Court 2023 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [3,200 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re TheReak Contempt of Court 2023 SDSC 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re TheReak Contempt of Court'' 2023 SDSC II |- | Date of judgment | 22nd February 2023 |- | Justices | Justice Literal |- | Held | Judgment of the Chief Justice in holding the appellant in contempt of court affirmed. |- | Ruling | 1-0 |- | Applicable precedent | A person need not necessarily be a party to judicial proceeding...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re TEA Investigations 2020 SDSC 7 (hist | edit) [2,472 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re TEA Investigations 2020 SDSC 7= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 11th March 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Euphyrric Justice CreatingKing Justice RemasterMorrowind |- | Held | The exclusion of the Attorney General in TEA investigations is constitutional as tax audits are not criminal investigations and therefore fall outside of the Attorney General’s remit. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable prece...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Summary Ban of Mooklyn 2023 SDSC 5 (hist | edit) [1,858 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Summary Ban of Mooklyn 2023 SDSC 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Mooklyn v State of SimDemocracy'' 2023 SDSC V |- | Date of judgment | 16th May 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Heath Justice Yummy Turtle Justice Mythrows |- | Held | Mooklyn’s ban, which the state gave no justification for, was unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Ch...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Summary Ban of BelugaWhale 2023 SDSC 6 (hist | edit) [1,745 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Summary Ban of BelugaWhale 2023 SDSC 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 16th May 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Heath Justice Yummy Turtle Justice Mythrows |- | Held | Beluga’s ban for selling SimDemocracy merchandise for a fundraiser was unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Creating merchandise of SimDemocracy is not a violation of the laws of SimDemocracy or the Disco...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re SDBI & SDIA Acts 2020 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [11,426 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re SDBI") originally created as "In re SDBI"
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [9,727 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 23rd December 2019 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Euphyrric Justice Danyo Justice Match Stix |- | Held | Restraining Order Act was unconstitutional because it deprived right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Freedom of expression protects “a citizen’s rights to freely express their political and religious...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Replacement of KingRed31 2020 SDSC 21 (hist | edit) [19,851 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Replacement of KingRed31 2020 SDSC 21= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 15th November 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Acting Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The replacement of u/KingRed31 was unconstitutional. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | An MP shall be replaced based on their most recent party, 31 |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Acting Justice Syndicalit...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Removal of Votes in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 18 (hist | edit) [8,630 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Removal of Votes in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 18= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 20th October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | The Electoral Commission did not meet the burden required to remove votes. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The removal of votes is on the balance of probabilities Upheld ''In re...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re NSFW Discord Channels 2020 SDSC 16 (hist | edit) [13,228 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re NSFW Discord Channels 2020 SDSC 16= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 12th October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice SeaOtter |- | Held | The government has a duty to remove self-declared minors from NSFW channels. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Reaffirms supremacy of Terms of Service under ''In re Restraining Order Act'' 2019 SDSC 1 16, 6 Real life law i...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Mute of BelugaWhaleMan 2021 SDSC 5 (hist | edit) [3,472 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Mute of BelugaWhaleMan 2021 SDSC 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 4th April 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | The mute was issued unlawfully. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | If a person is muted without accepting their ticket, it is issued unlawfully, 5 Ticket mutes that are procedurally unlawful are unconstitutional, 5.1 N...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties 2023 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [2,086 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties 2023 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties'' 2023 SDSC III |- | Date of judgment | 6th March 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Literal Justice Match Stix |- | Held | The Trans Ethnostate Party and Gay Ethnostate party do not violate the Discord Terms of Service. |- | Ruling | 2-...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment Petitions of Prime Minister Kelvin and Minister Sunbear 2021 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [8,734 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment Petitions of Prime Minister Kelvin and Minister Sunbear 2021 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 24th January 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice Syndicality Justice Ivy Cactus |- | Held | Impeachment of RightKelvin was lawful, Impeachment of Sunbear was not |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Possible consequences may affect the court’s remedies, but not b...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of Wolf 2020 SDSC 8 (hist | edit) [7,912 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of Wolf 2020 SDSC 8= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 13th April 2020 |- | Justices | Acting Chief Justice LordDeadlyOwl Acting Justice Ivy Cactus Acting Justice Comstock |- | Held | Impeachment of Wolf was unconstitutional as it violated the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Acting Chief Justice LordDeadlyOwl== ''(with Acting...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee 2023 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [7,941 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee 2023 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee'' 2023 SDSC I |- | Date of judgment | 12th January 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice halfcat Justice Literal Justice Mythrows |- | Held | The attempted impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee was conducted unlawfully. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The right...")
• 07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of halfcat 2023 SDSC 4 (hist | edit) [2,566 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of halfcat 2023 SDSC 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Impeachment of halfcat'' 2023 SDSC IV |- | Date of judgment | 7th March 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Literal Justice Match Stix |- | Held | The Senate’s impeachment vote of halfcat was legitimate and therefore halfcat was impeached from his position as Supreme Court Justice following the subsequent public referendum....")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Executive Orders 23 & 23-A 2022 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [2,940 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Executive Orders 23") originally created as "In re Executive Orders 23"
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6 (hist | edit) [3,895 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 3rd February 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy Justice Danyo |- | Held | The Contract Act is constitutional and consistent with the right to privacy and the right to liberty and security of the person |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy== ''(with Justice Da...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Clemency Request and Review Act 2025 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [4,734 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Clemency Request and Review Act 2025 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 18th February 2025 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Alexa Justice Syndicality Justice TheLittleSparty |- | Held | The Clemency Act is unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Inferior courts must be headed by a judge, 2 |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Chief Justice Alexa== ''(with Justice Syndicality and Justice...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Candidacy of Alien Users in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 19 (hist | edit) [3,182 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Candidacy of Alien Users in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 19= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | The candidacy of u/melloyellobiblu was legal. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Should a candidate for elected office circumvent the statutory restrictions, they shall not...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code 2020 SDSC 12 (hist | edit) [3,871 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code 2020 SDSC 12= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice CreatingKing Acting Justice Creative |- | Held | Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code, which allows for the Senate to try and convict for Contempt of the Senate charges, is unconstitutional as it violates the right to a fair hearing. It is also unconstitutional...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 3, Section 3 of the Citizenship Act 2021 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [11,462 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 3, Section 3 of the Citizenship Act 2021 SDSC 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th February 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The section was constitutional. |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | One does not automatically have SimDemocracy citizenship, but they do have the right to gain it fairly and equally, 10 Possessive “their”s in...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 2020 SDSC 13 (hist | edit) [6,698 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 2020 SDSC 13= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 9th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice CreatingKing Acting Justice SeaOtter |- | Held | Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 was unconstitutional because it unconstitutionally violated the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution 2020 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [15,381 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution 2020 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy |- | Held | Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution was constitutional and did not violate the right to suffrage |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Right to suffrage imposes a duty on the state to ensure elections are fair, 20 Verification...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [17,157 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th March 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | The state did not meet the Clear and Convincing standard, and the votes were not fraudulent. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The respondent is allowed to agree with the petitioner, 7 Votes must be removed usin...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 4th Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 23 (hist | edit) [8,532 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 4th Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 23= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 5th December 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Acting Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The votes eliminated were all valid, and the results shall be recalculated. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The standard for removing votes is clear and convincing evidence, 13 Partially overturns...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 42nd Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 14 (hist | edit) [6,277 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 42nd Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 14= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 25th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | An amendment to citizenship application requirements does not entail the deprivation of citizenship of those who don’t meet those new requirements. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The Senate has to write an...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 39th Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 11 (hist | edit) [16,164 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 39th Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 11= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 21st August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | The rigged votes cast during the 39th Presidential elections were to be struck out as they violated the petitioner’s right to suffrage (Article 20 of the Constitution). The election results were to be recalculated accordingl...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections 2020 SDSC 10 (hist | edit) [26,523 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections 2020 SDSC 10= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 8th August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | The 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial elections were unlawfully conducted because they used a verification system already repealed by a Senate resolution |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Ar...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 GxOZxerd (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 15 (hist | edit) [4,596 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = GxOZxerd (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 15= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 30th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Acting Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | An employer/employee relationship between the prosecutor and defendant is not a conflict of interest. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | An employer/employee relationship is not a...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 FakeRealRedditor v State of SimDemocracy 2020 Civ 4 (hist | edit) [1,562 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = FakeRealRedditor v State of SimDemocracy 2020 Civ 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 19th August 2020 |- | Judge | Justice CreatingKing |- | Grounds | Unpaid bonds (common law<ref>As there is no statutory tort, common law is the presumed authority</ref>) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for unpaid bonds |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Removal of a piece of legislation establishing a go...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Dodowarrior44 v FruitRollUp 2020 Civ 2 (hist | edit) [8,336 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Dodowarrior44 v FruitRollUp 2020 Civ 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th May 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Wolf |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held liable for civil harassment |- | Result | D had to make a public apology to P in #general-announcements D had to pay 80% of P’s legal fees |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Civil harassment is defined as “the intentional cont...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Dickhead68 (Appellant) v NovaSM (Respondent) 2019 SDCA 1 (hist | edit) [2,889 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Dickhead68 (Appellant) v NovaSM (Respondent) 2019 SDCA 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th July 2019 |- | Justices | Judge Danyo Judge Rudy2033 Judge BaneofBacon |- | Held | Setting new precedent does not amount to retroactive punishment |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | SimDemocracy is a common law jurisdiction, 2 The principle that repeated offences warrants greater sentencing i...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Benitfeet v NovaSM 2020 Civ 1 (hist | edit) [6,730 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Benitfeet v NovaSM 2020 Civ 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd April 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Wolf |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held liable for civil harassment |- | Result | D had to make a public apology to P in #general-announcements D had to pay 10 Tau in compensation to P D had to pay all of P’s legal fees Injunction issued against D ordering them to stop pinging...")
• 07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Belugawhaleman v Ministry of Justice 2020 Civ 6 (hist | edit) [8,210 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Belugawhaleman v Ministry of Justice 2020 Civ 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 20th December 2020 |- | Judge | Chief Justice Seaotter |- | Grounds | Tort of Wrongful Termination (Article 17\) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for Wrongful Termination |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Witnesses may not be called in civil hearings, 7 Message links and screenshots are to be treated as the...")