New pages

From SimDemocracy Archives

07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [1,854 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Ticket Act 2020 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Match Stix Justice Danyo Justice Euphyrric |- | Held | Ticket Act was unconstitutional because it deprived the right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Justice Danyo== ''(with Justices Match Stix and Euphyrric agreeing)'' '''[1].''' Article 22 (...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re TheReak Contempt of Court 2023 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [3,200 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re TheReak Contempt of Court 2023 SDSC 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re TheReak Contempt of Court'' 2023 SDSC II |- | Date of judgment | 22nd February 2023 |- | Justices | Justice Literal |- | Held | Judgment of the Chief Justice in holding the appellant in contempt of court affirmed. |- | Ruling | 1-0 |- | Applicable precedent | A person need not necessarily be a party to judicial proceeding...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re TEA Investigations 2020 SDSC 7 (hist | edit) [2,472 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re TEA Investigations 2020 SDSC 7= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 11th March 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Euphyrric Justice CreatingKing Justice RemasterMorrowind |- | Held | The exclusion of the Attorney General in TEA investigations is constitutional as tax audits are not criminal investigations and therefore fall outside of the Attorney General’s remit. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable prece...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Summary Ban of Mooklyn 2023 SDSC 5 (hist | edit) [1,858 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Summary Ban of Mooklyn 2023 SDSC 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Mooklyn v State of SimDemocracy'' 2023 SDSC V |- | Date of judgment | 16th May 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Heath Justice Yummy Turtle Justice Mythrows |- | Held | Mooklyn’s ban, which the state gave no justification for, was unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Ch...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Summary Ban of BelugaWhale 2023 SDSC 6 (hist | edit) [1,745 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Summary Ban of BelugaWhale 2023 SDSC 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 16th May 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Heath Justice Yummy Turtle Justice Mythrows |- | Held | Beluga’s ban for selling SimDemocracy merchandise for a fundraiser was unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Creating merchandise of SimDemocracy is not a violation of the laws of SimDemocracy or the Disco...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re SDBI & SDIA Acts 2020 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [11,426 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re SDBI") originally created as "In re SDBI"
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [9,727 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Restraining Order Act 2019 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 23rd December 2019 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Euphyrric Justice Danyo Justice Match Stix |- | Held | Restraining Order Act was unconstitutional because it deprived right to a fair trial |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Freedom of expression protects “a citizen’s rights to freely express their political and religious...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Replacement of KingRed31 2020 SDSC 21 (hist | edit) [19,851 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Replacement of KingRed31 2020 SDSC 21= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 15th November 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Acting Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The replacement of u/KingRed31 was unconstitutional. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | An MP shall be replaced based on their most recent party, 31 |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Acting Justice Syndicalit...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Removal of Votes in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 18 (hist | edit) [8,630 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Removal of Votes in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 18= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 20th October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | The Electoral Commission did not meet the burden required to remove votes. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The removal of votes is on the balance of probabilities Upheld ''In re...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re NSFW Discord Channels 2020 SDSC 16 (hist | edit) [13,228 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re NSFW Discord Channels 2020 SDSC 16= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 12th October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice SeaOtter |- | Held | The government has a duty to remove self-declared minors from NSFW channels. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Reaffirms supremacy of Terms of Service under ''In re Restraining Order Act'' 2019 SDSC 1 16, 6 Real life law i...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Mute of BelugaWhaleMan 2021 SDSC 5 (hist | edit) [3,472 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Mute of BelugaWhaleMan 2021 SDSC 5= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 4th April 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | The mute was issued unlawfully. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | If a person is muted without accepting their ticket, it is issued unlawfully, 5 Ticket mutes that are procedurally unlawful are unconstitutional, 5.1 N...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties 2023 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [2,086 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties 2023 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Limits of Government Accommodation of Political Parties'' 2023 SDSC III |- | Date of judgment | 6th March 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Literal Justice Match Stix |- | Held | The Trans Ethnostate Party and Gay Ethnostate party do not violate the Discord Terms of Service. |- | Ruling | 2-...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment Petitions of Prime Minister Kelvin and Minister Sunbear 2021 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [8,734 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment Petitions of Prime Minister Kelvin and Minister Sunbear 2021 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 24th January 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice Syndicality Justice Ivy Cactus |- | Held | Impeachment of RightKelvin was lawful, Impeachment of Sunbear was not |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Possible consequences may affect the court’s remedies, but not b...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of Wolf 2020 SDSC 8 (hist | edit) [7,912 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of Wolf 2020 SDSC 8= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 13th April 2020 |- | Justices | Acting Chief Justice LordDeadlyOwl Acting Justice Ivy Cactus Acting Justice Comstock |- | Held | Impeachment of Wolf was unconstitutional as it violated the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Acting Chief Justice LordDeadlyOwl== ''(with Acting...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee 2023 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [7,941 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee 2023 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee'' 2023 SDSC I |- | Date of judgment | 12th January 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice halfcat Justice Literal Justice Mythrows |- | Held | The attempted impeachment of Senator TopNotchCoffee was conducted unlawfully. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The right...")
07:4307:43, 9 March 2025 In re Impeachment of halfcat 2023 SDSC 4 (hist | edit) [2,566 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Impeachment of halfcat 2023 SDSC 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Alternate citation ! ''In re Impeachment of halfcat'' 2023 SDSC IV |- | Date of judgment | 7th March 2023 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Literal Justice Match Stix |- | Held | The Senate’s impeachment vote of halfcat was legitimate and therefore halfcat was impeached from his position as Supreme Court Justice following the subsequent public referendum....")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Executive Orders 23 & 23-A 2022 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [2,940 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Executive Orders 23") originally created as "In re Executive Orders 23"
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6 (hist | edit) [3,895 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Contract Act 2020 SDSC 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 3rd February 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy Justice Danyo |- | Held | The Contract Act is constitutional and consistent with the right to privacy and the right to liberty and security of the person |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Chief Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy== ''(with Justice Da...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Clemency Request and Review Act 2025 SDSC 1 (hist | edit) [4,734 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Clemency Request and Review Act 2025 SDSC 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 18th February 2025 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Alexa Justice Syndicality Justice TheLittleSparty |- | Held | The Clemency Act is unconstitutional |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Inferior courts must be headed by a judge, 2 |} == MAJORITY OPINION by Chief Justice Alexa== ''(with Justice Syndicality and Justice...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Candidacy of Alien Users in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 19 (hist | edit) [3,182 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Candidacy of Alien Users in the 2nd Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 19= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd October 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | The candidacy of u/melloyellobiblu was legal. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Should a candidate for elected office circumvent the statutory restrictions, they shall not...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code 2020 SDSC 12 (hist | edit) [3,871 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code 2020 SDSC 12= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice CreatingKing Acting Justice Creative |- | Held | Article 56, s4 of the Criminal Code, which allows for the Senate to try and convict for Contempt of the Senate charges, is unconstitutional as it violates the right to a fair hearing. It is also unconstitutional...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 3, Section 3 of the Citizenship Act 2021 SDSC 2 (hist | edit) [11,462 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 3, Section 3 of the Citizenship Act 2021 SDSC 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th February 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The section was constitutional. |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | One does not automatically have SimDemocracy citizenship, but they do have the right to gain it fairly and equally, 10 Possessive “their”s in...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 2020 SDSC 13 (hist | edit) [6,698 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 2020 SDSC 13= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 9th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice CreatingKing Acting Justice SeaOtter |- | Held | Article 10, s2 of the Trial and Pre-Trial Procedures Act 2020 was unconstitutional because it unconstitutionally violated the right to a fair hearing |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution 2020 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [15,381 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution 2020 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd January 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice SlimmyJimmyGrimmy |- | Held | Appendix s1.7 of the Constitution was constitutional and did not violate the right to suffrage |- | Ruling | 2-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Right to suffrage imposes a duty on the state to ensure elections are fair, 20 Verification...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3 (hist | edit) [17,157 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 9th Parliamentary Election 2021 SDSC 3= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th March 2021 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Ivy Cactus Justice Syndicality Justice Fermiboson |- | Held | The state did not meet the Clear and Convincing standard, and the votes were not fraudulent. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The respondent is allowed to agree with the petitioner, 7 Votes must be removed usin...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 4th Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 23 (hist | edit) [8,532 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 4th Parliamentary Election 2020 SDSC 23= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 5th December 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice SeaOtter Justice TheMainCharacter Acting Justice Syndicality |- | Held | The votes eliminated were all valid, and the results shall be recalculated. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The standard for removing votes is clear and convincing evidence, 13 Partially overturns...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 42nd Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 14 (hist | edit) [6,277 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 42nd Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 14= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 25th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | An amendment to citizenship application requirements does not entail the deprivation of citizenship of those who don’t meet those new requirements. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | The Senate has to write an...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 39th Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 11 (hist | edit) [16,164 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 39th Presidential Election 2020 SDSC 11= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 21st August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | The rigged votes cast during the 39th Presidential elections were to be struck out as they violated the petitioner’s right to suffrage (Article 20 of the Constitution). The election results were to be recalculated accordingl...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections 2020 SDSC 10 (hist | edit) [26,523 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = In re 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial Elections 2020 SDSC 10= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 8th August 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Justice CreatingKing |- | Held | The 38th Presidential and 38th Senatorial elections were unlawfully conducted because they used a verification system already repealed by a Senate resolution |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | Ar...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 GxOZxerd (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 15 (hist | edit) [4,596 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = GxOZxerd (Appellant) v State of SimDemocracy (Respondent) 2020 SDSC 15= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 30th September 2020 |- | Justices | Chief Justice Danyo Justice Ivy Cactus Acting Justice LordDeadlyOwl |- | Held | An employer/employee relationship between the prosecutor and defendant is not a conflict of interest. |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable precedent | An employer/employee relationship is not a...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 FakeRealRedditor v State of SimDemocracy 2020 Civ 4 (hist | edit) [1,562 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = FakeRealRedditor v State of SimDemocracy 2020 Civ 4= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 19th August 2020 |- | Judge | Justice CreatingKing |- | Grounds | Unpaid bonds (common law<ref>As there is no statutory tort, common law is the presumed authority</ref>) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for unpaid bonds |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Removal of a piece of legislation establishing a go...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Dodowarrior44 v FruitRollUp 2020 Civ 2 (hist | edit) [8,336 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Dodowarrior44 v FruitRollUp 2020 Civ 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 6th May 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Wolf |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held liable for civil harassment |- | Result | D had to make a public apology to P in #general-announcements D had to pay 80% of P’s legal fees |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Civil harassment is defined as “the intentional cont...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Dickhead68 (Appellant) v NovaSM (Respondent) 2019 SDCA 1 (hist | edit) [2,889 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Dickhead68 (Appellant) v NovaSM (Respondent) 2019 SDCA 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 17th July 2019 |- | Justices | Judge Danyo Judge Rudy2033 Judge BaneofBacon |- | Held | Setting new precedent does not amount to retroactive punishment |- | Ruling | 3-0 |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | SimDemocracy is a common law jurisdiction, 2 The principle that repeated offences warrants greater sentencing i...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Benitfeet v NovaSM 2020 Civ 1 (hist | edit) [6,730 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Benitfeet v NovaSM 2020 Civ 1= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 22nd April 2020 |- | Judge | Judge Wolf |- | Grounds | Civil harassment (common law) |- | Verdict | D held liable for civil harassment |- | Result | D had to make a public apology to P in #general-announcements D had to pay 10 Tau in compensation to P D had to pay all of P’s legal fees Injunction issued against D ordering them to stop pinging...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 Belugawhaleman v Ministry of Justice 2020 Civ 6 (hist | edit) [8,210 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = Belugawhaleman v Ministry of Justice 2020 Civ 6= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 20th December 2020 |- | Judge | Chief Justice Seaotter |- | Grounds | Tort of Wrongful Termination (Article 17\) |- | Verdict | D held not liable for Wrongful Termination |- | Result | |- | Applicable persuasive precedent | Witnesses may not be called in civil hearings, 7 Message links and screenshots are to be treated as the...")
07:4207:42, 9 March 2025 BelugaWhaleMan9 v State of SimDemocracy 2024 Civ 2 (hist | edit) [10,732 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Case Law = BelugaWhaleMan9 v State of SimDemocracy 2024 Civ 2= {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" |- ! Date of judgment ! 28th July 2024 |- | Judge | Justice halfcat |- | Grounds | Tort of Breach of Civil Rights (Article 22c) Tort of Breach of Police Responsibility (Article 22b) Common Law Tort of Civil Negligence |- | Verdict | D held liable for Breach of Police Responsibility and Breach of Civil Rights, D held not liable for Civil Negligence...")

05:2005:20, 5 March 2025 EO 136-18 Tariff War on the United States (hist | edit) [282 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Executive Orders ''Issued by Muggy (._.symph0ny._.)'' '''Whereas''' SimDemocracy should be included in the trade wars that the United States initiates. 1. SimDemocracy will put a 1000% tariff on all American goods. 2. The memes will be taken as soon as they cross the border.")
05:1805:18, 5 March 2025 EO 136-17 Iowa Denouncement BACK ON! (hist | edit) [204 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Executive Orders ''Issued by Muggy (._.symph0ny._.)'' **Whereas** I don’t feel like Iowa should continue to not be condemned. 1. EO 136 - 11 is formally repealed")
05:1405:14, 5 March 2025 EO 136-16 Archiving Channels (hist | edit) [451 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Executive Orders ''Issued by Muggy (._.symph0ny._.)'' '''Whereas''' The Senate has done an expropriation vote on the following channels, being that they should be archived. ⁠#emperor-dman-legal-consulting shall become an archived channel. ⁠#simdemocracy-prize-panel shall become an archived channel. ⁠#beluga-legal-consultations-inve… shall become an archived channel ⁠#acta-diurna shall become an archived channel.")
05:0705:07, 5 March 2025 EO 136-15 The Duality of The National Anthem (hist | edit) [662 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Executive Orders ''Issued by Muggy (._.symph0ny._.)'' '''Whereas''' No piece of existing legislation mandates the official SinDemocracy National Anthem. '''Whereas''' Two anthems that are of members of the SimDemocracy Community should be recognized The formal official anthem of SimDemocracy shall be “Democracy’s Triumph” (Link: https://youtu.be/Vx8nWBuzTxw?si=n5B_4uFEKZR7r5SI) and shall be used in formal events or ceremonies. The informal officia...")
05:0405:04, 5 March 2025 EO 136 - 14 Presidential Commendations (hist | edit) [2,239 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "**Whereas** By law I have to give people Presidential Medals of Honor through Executive Order. **Whereas** Syndicality doesn’t have enough Presidential Medals of Honor 1. slimjimthegrim Will receive a Presidential Medal of Honor due to his continued commitment to SimDemocracy, his work in the community, and his being a general pleasure to be around. 2. wellitsaname Will receive a Presidential Medal of Honor due to her extensive work in The Secretary Name National Ar...")

19:4119:41, 4 March 2025 Compound Tax Plan Act 2025 (hist | edit) [4,623 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Compound Tax Plan Act 2025 = Category:Legislation Category:Economic Laws '''Passed on the 1st of March 2025''' ==Preamble == Whereas it is in the best interest of the people that the SimDemocracy government becomes financially self-sufficient;<br> Whereas the SimDemocracy economy is primed for growth and value-creation;<br> Whereas the people must be able to rely on future social and government programs not requiring the inflation of the money supply. == Artic...")
19:2619:26, 4 March 2025 The It’s Not Transparency Unless It’s Hand-Delivered Act (hist | edit) [1,311 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= The It’s Not Transparency Unless It’s Hand-Delivered Act = Category:Legislation Category:Other Laws '''Passed on the 1st of March 2025''' == Preamble == Whereas: The Senate Records Act is not enough transparency for some people. == Article 1: Setup == §1. A #law-change-announcements channel shall be created within the SimDemocracy Discord under the Infos category. §2. A @Law Change Ping role shall be created within the SimDemocracy Discord. :§2.1. User...")
19:1619:16, 4 March 2025 Government Bonds Expansion Act (hist | edit) [5,683 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Government Bonds Expansion Act = Category:Legislation Category:Economic Law '''Passed on the 2nd of March 2025''' == Section 1: Economic Foundation Act == §1. The Revised Economic Foundation Act Part 1, Article 3, §1.3 shall be stricken == Article 1: Request and Approval == §1. The Senate shall have the authority to authorize and instruct the Department of Treasury to create government bonds after a majority vote as a one-time measure, as part of the passage...")
19:1319:13, 4 March 2025 The Casinos and Gambling Regulations 2025 (hist | edit) [4,267 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= The Casinos and Gambling Regulations Act (2025) = Category:Legislation Category:Economic Law '''Passed on the 2nd of March 2025''' == Preamble: == This Bill will ensure that all Citizens of SimDemocracy are not at risk of fraud, scams, and exploitation in External Casinos within SimDemocracy. It will ensure all citizens have a fair, transparent, and regulated opportunity to gamble. Finally, it will enforce punishments and consequences for those who operate casi...")
17:1417:14, 4 March 2025 Executive Bill Approval Act 2025 (hist | edit) [1,725 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Legislation Category:Executive '''Passed on the 2nd of March 2025''' == Preamble == Whereas bills that are passed by the senate currently become law immediately upon passage and are then struck down by Presidential veto, Whereas this causes a great deal of confusion to the parties affected by the bill in question as well as the archivists, == Section 1 == §1. When a bill passes in the senate, it is then delivered, by the Vice President, to the office of...")
12:1212:12, 4 March 2025 Senate Records Act (hist | edit) [4,454 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Legislation Category:Legislative == Preamble == Whereas: The Senate Docket Establishment Act was intended to make senate voting records easily accessible in a specialized #senate-docket channel. Whereas: The #senate-docket channel is instead being used to track future debates and votes. The following act is hereby proposed. == Article 1: Appointment and Dismissal of the Senate Clerk == :§1. The Speaker of the Senate shall appoint a Senate Clerk within 3...")
11:5511:55, 4 March 2025 Senate Record Sheets Amendment (hist | edit) [761 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Preamble== Whereas: The senate records are currently organized into one document per Senate, but the Senate Records Act mandates one tab per Senate. ==Section 1== §1. Article 2 §3. of the Senate Records Act shall be amended to the following: <div class="toccolours"> §3. The records maintained by the Senate Clerk must be released to the public via a channel on the SimDemocracy Discord under the Senate category with the title #senate-records. :§3.1. Each Senate shall...")
11:5411:54, 4 March 2025 Engagement Incentive Bonuses Act (hist | edit) [4,857 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Legislation Category:Economic Law '''Passed on the 28th of February 2025''' == Preamble == Whereas incentivizing engagement supports SimDemocracy, this Act establishes an incentive system to encourage active participation. == Article 1: Title == §1. This Act shall be known as the "Engagement Incentives Bonuses Act." == Article 2: Information Authority == §1. The Department of Expansion shall have the authority to access only the information necessary t...")
11:4011:40, 4 March 2025 Hacked Accounts (Enforcement) Act (hist | edit) [2,104 bytes] Chief Archivist Ferris (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Legislation Category:Executive ==Preamble: == An Act to make provisions for competent authorities to take quick action to remove messages by Hacked Accounts, and also to remove the relevant accounts. == Article 1: Title == §1 This act may be cited as the “Hacked Accounts (Enforcement) Act”. == Article 2: Enforcement == §2. Where an account has shown signs of being hacked, a competent authority may kick the accounts, upon order from a Judge, and cau...")

Retrieved from "https://qwrky.dev/mediawiki/index.php/Special:NewPages"